- From: Joe Pea <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:55:03 -0700
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 22 March 2021 17:55:16 UTC
> It could be decided that if a registry changes that already upgraded elements are left as-is. That's true, that could definitely be decided, but it may lead to unexpected results where the same element names are used in some cases but they don't behave as such. > only go from undefined to defined at most once. I think it would be a safe bet to start with this approach, then if/when we want to allow the registry to be changeable it can be added later once it is known how the ideal behavior would be. Another thing I just thought of is moving an element from one root to another root that has the same element name defined: would the element be downgraded, then upgraded to use its new class? I think this will be a rare sort of thing. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/914#issuecomment-804270883
Received on Monday, 22 March 2021 17:55:16 UTC