Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Geolocation API (#529)

Just FYI, I've updated the README to be more like an explainer:
https://github.com/w3c/geolocation-api/pull/65

I've also called out the examples in the spec, as they also serve the role of an explainer.

@hadleybeeman:
 >  we aren't sure that it makes sense to put normative references on the recipients of geolocation information. They aren't implementing the spec. Perhaps you'd want to make these non-normative?

Yeah, you are right... recipients are not a conformance class, so the conformance requirements make no sense there. I'll send a PR to fix that up. 


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/529#issuecomment-803776212