Re: [WICG/webcomponents] [scoped-registries] Interaction with declarative shadow DOM (#914)

> Given that element definitions require script, I'm not sure there's much to be gained by making registries declarative at this point. Same with registry names. Since you need script already, you can use script to associate registries and shadow roots. When we get to declarative custom elements that may change.

The issue is of the order. In the case of a partial hydration, is it true that all element definitions come in top-down order in all use cases? As in, is it really okay that all ancestor custom elements need to be upgraded in order for any descendant custom element to be upgraded?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/914#issuecomment-799787417