- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 20:38:45 -0800
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2021 04:38:56 UTC
Hi @inexorabletash, in w3c/transitions#318, we need to clarify something in the Status of This document. Basically: > The spec should state whether it's meant to replace IDB 2 or something different. > For example, the status could say" IDB 3.0 is intended to supersede IDB 2.0". I checked the Revision History, and it's not completely clear. Would you mind adding something to the Status of This Document? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/348#issuecomment-793378535
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2021 04:38:56 UTC