Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider a pattern for dictionary arguments which must have at least one member (#903) from Kagami Sascha Rosylight on 2021-03-05 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from March 2021)

From: Kagami Sascha Rosylight <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 14:42:37 -0800
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/903/791767012@github.com>

> It doesn't seem like this would simplify the logic for `observe()`.

IMO this one is more about the syntax rather than about simplifying logic. I can imagine an author write an operation with the one-member-required behavior in mind and then get yelled by IDL validator.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/903#issuecomment-791767012

Received on Friday, 5 March 2021 22:42:49 UTC