- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 23:54:01 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2021 07:54:15 UTC
See also #342 and #865. My current thinking on this: * SharedArrayBuffer should be its own IDL type. We should not overload the ArrayBuffer IDL type to being able to represent ArrayBuffer and SharedArrayBuffer JS types. * [AllowShared] only applies to ArrayBufferView types. * We should leave BufferSource as-is. * We should add SharedBufferSource that also accepts SharedArrayBuffer and that uses [AllowShared] in front of ArrayBufferView. The outcome of that might well be that [AllowShared] BufferSource is valid as [AllowShared] would end up ignored for ArrayBuffer. I don't have strong feelings about that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/961#issuecomment-790405115
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2021 07:54:15 UTC