Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebCodecs (again!) (#612)

> We generally reserve "users" to describe end-users, not web developers. End-users deserve well-designed applications that work without jank across devices of all abilities, and regardless of user agent.

I respect that. I think we should also consider web developers as advocates for their users. 

> I think the WG with its current stance (which it is in the process of attempting to assert through CfC) is being cautious with the tools it exposes to web developers in different environments, and when, to help ensure this outcome for end-users.

At this time the WG does not have a stance. The members of the WG are in disagreement. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/612#issuecomment-864238592