- From: Matt Menke <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:47:48 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1245/review/674380478@github.com>
@MattMenke2 commented on this pull request. > +<a for=/>IP addresses</a>. If this operation succeeds, return the <a for=/>set</a> of +<a for=/>IP addresses</a>. If it fails, return failure. The results of this operation may be cached. +If they are cached, <var>key</var> must be used as part of the cache key. + +<p class=note>Typically this operation would involve DNS. The particulars (apart from the cache key) +are not tied down as they are not pertinent to the system the Fetch Standard establishes. Other +documents ought not to build on this primitive without having a considered discussion with the Fetch +Standard community first. [[RFC1035]] + +<p>To <dfn>resolve an origin</dfn>, given an <a for=/>origin</a> <var>origin</var> and a +<a for=/>network partition key</a> <var>key</var>: +<!-- Should we assert the scheme here to be an HTTP(S) scheme or a WebRTC scheme? --> + +<ol> + <li><p>If <var>origin</var>'s <a for=origin>host</a> is an <a for=/>IP address</a>, then return + « <var>origin</var>'s <a for=origin>host</a> ». Maybe just add "as an IP address", then? Or perhaps I'm alone in thinking pseudo-code as text should be type safe. :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1245#discussion_r644094935
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2021 15:48:51 UTC