- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 01:47:10 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2021 08:47:34 UTC
> the concept of "installability of the document" doesn't make a lot of sense, given that most browsers allow any document to be installed. So we should just remove the concept of "installability of the document". Removed. > a) making up a virtual manifest for sites that have none I think it might be overly presumptuous to assume they use the same mechanism or defaults. I think we should just stay silent on this. > b) reconciling the processed manifest with the document URL to make sure its scope and start_url are same-origin as the document URL. I think this is handled as far as there is a document and link relationship. > The goal is to let an external system (such as an app store) install a manifest without any document, I'm thinking this should be a non-goal *for now*. We should just solve for manifests installed from documents. > but if a browser installs a manifest from a document, disallow installation of an app that's hosted on a different origin to the originating document. Agree. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/912#issuecomment-851948805
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2021 08:47:34 UTC