Re: [w3c/editing] Updated the intro material to better reflect the current status. (#302)

I'm not going to do anything further until the pull request I have
already submitted is resolved.
Adding to the queue of material that you regard as "controversial" does
not seem useful.

Does anyone else who has read it think it is controversial?

On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 00:50 -0700, Johannes Wilm wrote:
> Ok, but so that is a useful starting point then. If you could
> document that useful subset, then that would seem like a good
> starting point for discussing this again. Maybe we could have a
> document that only covers such a useful subset. There are only three
> main rendering engines out there right now and mostly those will
> likely correspond with differences in execCommand behavior.
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/pull/302#issuecomment-887478807