- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:43:41 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2021 21:43:53 UTC
@domenic commented on this pull request. > +<div algorithm> + To <dfn export for="ReadableStream">enqueue</dfn> the JavaScript value |chunk| into a + {{ReadableStream}} |stream|: + + 1. If |stream|.[=ReadableStream/[[controller]]=] [=implements=] + {{ReadableStreamDefaultController}}, + 1. Perform ! [$ReadableStreamDefaultControllerEnqueue$](|stream|.[=ReadableStream/[[controller]]=], + |chunk|). + 1. Otherwise, + 1. Assert: |stream|.[=ReadableStream/[[controller]]=] [=implements=] + {{ReadableByteStreamController}}. + 1. Assert: |chunk| is an {{ArrayBufferView}}. + 1. Let |byobRequest| be ! + [$ReadableByteStreamControllerGetBYOBRequest$](|stream|.[=ReadableStream/[[controller]]=]). + 1. If |byobRequest| is non-null, and |chunk|.\[[ViewedArrayBuffer]].\[[ArrayBufferData]] is the + same [=Data Block=] as |byobRequest|.\[[view]].\[[ViewedArrayBuffer]].\[[ArrayBufferData]], Oh, dang, you're right. In that case we should probably solve it by, per the above discussion, prohibiting transferring at a spec level (but allowing it an implementation level as long as the implementation does appropriate behind-the-scenes contortions). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/1130#discussion_r669975382
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2021 21:43:53 UTC