- From: Piotr Tomiak <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 01:20:36 -0800
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/776/762109185@github.com>
@daKmoR @justinfagnani Looks like I am a little bit late to the party :/ I wish someone had pinged me on this topic earlier. I've finally moved to the next phase of improving `web-types` to be a de facto standard for any web-framework, not just Vue.js - we had to evaluate it's usefulness and gather feedback before moving further. I can see that a lot has happend in Web Components community in the meanwhile. What is the currently accepted format for describing WebComponents library? @justinfagnani Creating yet another standard makes it really hard for each IDE and documentation tool to support every framework out there. Can we work on merging your schema with `web-types` schema? Our goal as JetBrains is not to force any standard on the community, but to drive community to accept a single format for exchanging information about JavaScript library contents, which we believe will benefit everyone. If you don't feel that hosting an open source repo under `JetBrains` org is good for community we are open for transferring the repo under some community organization. As I see now, `custom-elements.json` being shipped with some Web Component libraries pretty closely resemble `web-types` JSON. We have resources to support yet another JSON format, but what about other lightweight text-editors? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/776#issuecomment-762109185
Received on Monday, 18 January 2021 09:20:49 UTC