Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableStreamClose with async iterator and pending read requests errors (#1100)

> If you're okay with it, I can make a PR to move those steps around in the specification and update that single WPT test to expect a slightly different order

That would be lovely!

> Or alternatively: maybe we should make the test not check the order of reader.read() and reader.closed becoming rejected? It doesn't seem that important

I agree it's not that important, but I think more coverage is nicer for anything observable. We can always change things around as we go.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1100#issuecomment-761285346