Re: [whatwg/dom] Is it intentional to not expose AbortSignal to Worklets? (#937)

I don't see Paul mentioning that? In any event, given that we expose events in audio worklets, it seems we should expose this as otherwise `addEventListener()` is less functional in audio worklets and that would be confusing.

(If you want other APIs to adopt this as well, typically you would make them accept a dictionary with a `signal` member, as `addEventListener()` and `fetch()` do, for instance.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/937#issuecomment-755129598