- From: Matt Menke <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:47:57 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 27 February 2021 20:48:09 UTC
Seems like that would be doable for TLS client auth, but gets very weird in the HTTP auth + socket limits case, so I'd rather not go in this direction. Eg, suppose you've labeled on socket as credentials due to an NTLM challenge, and then you're at your socket pool limit for uncredentialed sockets, and then you get (uncredentialed socket max + 1) credentialed requests...do you hold back one of your uncredentialed sockets, since you don't want to upgrade them all? Socket assigned just gets very weird and complicated, and you now have a notion of sockets that are similar-ish to each other, and can be somewhat used interchangeably with respect to each other, but not quite. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/341#issuecomment-787132892
Received on Saturday, 27 February 2021 20:48:09 UTC