Re: [whatwg/url] Prevent the pathname setter from erasing the path of path-only URLs, … (#582)

Editorially LGTM and matches the tests and jsdom/whatwg-url implementation.

In terms of interop and implementation alignment, of the three tests added in https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/27720:

- Safari passes test 1 and 3, but not test 2
- Firefox and Chrome pass test 1, but not test 2 or test 3
- jsdom/whatwg-url, and thus the current spec, passes tests 1 and 2 but not test 3

Should we consider changing the spec for test 2? I don't have a strong intuition on the model here though so maybe there's a reason that would be bad.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/pull/582#issuecomment-784415580