Re: [whatwg/fetch] Propagate URL fragments (#696)

@davidben commented on this pull request.



> @@ -3835,6 +3836,13 @@ these steps:
       </ul>
 
       <p>then return a <a>network error</a>.
+
+     <li>
+      <p>Set <var>actualResponse</var>'s <a for=response>URL</a>'s <a for=url>fragment</a> to
+      <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>current URL</a>'s <a for=url>fragment</a>.
+
+      <p class=note>There is currently no mechanism for the service worker to control
+      <var>actualResponse</var>'s <a for=response>URL</a>'s <a for=url>fragment</a>.

And I guess both formulations have another weird corner: the response's URL isn't a field per se. It's a pointer to the last entry in the URL list. In which case, what does it mean to update it? Do you write into the last entry of the URL list but leave the others alone? What if the URL list is empty because this was script-constructed?

https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-response-url

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/696#discussion_r577931332