- From: Adam Rice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:55:38 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2021 20:55:51 UTC
I haven't heard a sufficiently compelling use case for cancelling a single `read()` while leaving other reads pending. Strictly speaking, if a call to `read()` caused backpressure to be relieved, then cancelling the `read()` should cause backpressure to be re-established, but we have no mechanism to do that. The fact that this makes byte streams into a special case worries me greatly. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1103#issuecomment-773598044
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2021 20:55:51 UTC