- From: Alwin Blok <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 02:30:04 -0800
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 27 December 2021 10:30:16 UTC
Ok. So it makes sense to investigate this more thoroughly; how percent coding opaque hosts could/ should interact with the ipv6 address syntax, and make it a separate issue (as was suggested). Maybe we can take care of that first? I’m fine with handling this one first, but I myself just can’t really get behind having two distinct forbidden host codepoints sets… it may just be a minor thing, I realise. But still… Is failing on all controls in opaque hosts really not an option? Maybe there are there solutions? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/pull/673#issuecomment-1001497019 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/url/pull/673/c1001497019@github.com>
Received on Monday, 27 December 2021 10:30:16 UTC