- From: Will Cassella <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 14:24:19 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/697@github.com>
Braw mornin' TAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of adding `video-` prefixed media features.
`video-` prefixed media features give webpages the ability to disambiguate media queries for devices which have different display characteristics for video and non-video web content.
- Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): [Explainer for `video-` prefixed media features](https://github.com/willcassella/blink-hdr/blob/main/explainers/video-%20prefixed%20media%20features.md)
- Specification URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/mediaqueries-5/#video-prefixed-features
- Tests: https://wpt.fyi/results/css/mediaqueries/dynamic-range.html
- Security and Privacy self-review²: https://github.com/w3c/security-request/issues/19
- GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues
- Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
- Dean Jackson - Apple, spec editor
- Florian Rivoal - Spec editor
- Tab Atkins Jr - Google, spec editor
- Chris Cunningham (chcunningham) - Google, spec
- Will Cassella (willcassella) - Google, implementor in Chromium
- Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: Google, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, HBBTV
- Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification:
- https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4471
- https://github.com/w3c/media-capabilities/issues/135
- External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): Not yet created
Further details:
- [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/)
- Relevant time constraints or deadlines: None
- The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSSWG
- The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if current group is a community group or other incubation venue): CSSWG
- Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: None (yet?)
- This work is being funded by: Implementation by Google
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as:
💬 leave review feedback as a **comment in this issue** and @-notify willcassella
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/697
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2021 22:24:31 UTC