- From: Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 01:28:29 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2021 08:28:41 UTC
Hi - just coming back to this again. The PR you've referenced above is appreciated. I'm still concerned that with the presence of this API developers will always choose to request *raw camera access* even if they don't need it, thereby rendering the privacy-preserving aspects of regular *camera access* meaningless... Can the explainer or the spec go into more detail on why this won't be the case? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/652#issuecomment-904433805
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2021 08:28:41 UTC