- From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 22:16:06 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/667@github.com>
Ya ya yawm TAG! I'm requesting a TAG review of same-origin prerendereing triggered by speculationrules. This feature is about the specific case of same-origin prerendering triggered by the [speculation rules API](triggers.md). This feature enables authors to provide a hint to the browser to prerender a URL, so the end-user can experience a near-instantaneous page load if that URL is visited. - Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): https://github.com/jeremyroman/alternate-loading-modes/blob/main/same-origin-explainer.md - Security and Privacy self-review²: https://github.com/mfalken/alternate-loading-modes/blob/sec-priv/same-origin-security-privacy-questionnaire.md (will update the URL upon merge to the main repo) - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/jeremyroman/alternate-loading-modes - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): - Matt Falkenhagen (mfalken), Google, contributor - Domenic Denicola (domenic), Google, editor - Organization/project driving the design: Google Chrome - External status/issue trackers for this feature (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): https://chromestatus.com/feature/5355965538893824 Further details: - ✅ I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/) - The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): WICG (future) - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known): WHATWG - Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design: n/a - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: none known - This work is being funded by: Google You should also know that... This feature is related to #611 in that it is a specific case of that triggering mechanism. It is also related to #613, which is a particular API exposed by this feature. We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option): ☂️ open a single issue in our GitHub repo **for the entire review** -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/667
Received on Monday, 16 August 2021 05:16:19 UTC