Re: [w3c/permissions] Handle non-fully-active documents (#162)

I'm in agreement that it should "just work". However, it now becomes a matter of implementation commitments depending on how much additional infrastructure is needed to coalesce the permissions changes (hi @jan-ivar, @johannhof on the Gecko side!). 

> It does complicate the spec a bit, but we'll be happy to help writing them if needed!

That would be amazing! Continued help with https://github.com/w3c/permissions/pull/249 would be greatly appreciated. 

Maybe we can do that in two parts?... the easy part might be landing what I've already spec'ed in #249, with the bonus is that I've got a patch approved and ready to land for Gecko. I would need you or other folks from the Chrome side to approve #249 and commit to implementing that. 

Then, in parallel, we can tackle the the part needed to deal with queuing the events and make it work seamlessly as per @fergald's suggestion 2. 
 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/162#issuecomment-896524993

Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2021 05:59:08 UTC