- From: Michael Catanzaro <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:42:57 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2021 01:43:09 UTC
I can't provide an official answer for WebKit. CC: @othermaciej > Ok, so it really comes down to wether having the new structured data is worth the implementation effort here. Personal answer: CH is surely not any worse than what we have now. But WebKit's bar for feature inclusion is pretty high, and the benefit doesn't seem great. What would _really_ incentivize implementation would be to combine CH with some _very aggressive_ plan to make it harder to detect what browser is in use, e.g. remove the Sec-CH-UA hint from the spec, then pair CH with a plan to pare down existing UA strings on all browsers, even if it temporarily breaks some websites. Think "remove the string 'Chrome' from the user agent" level of change. Then I could get excited about CH. That would be a pretty huge change though, and I doubt it's in the cards. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/640#issuecomment-895663999
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2021 01:43:09 UTC