- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 03:01:01 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2020 10:01:14 UTC
I would not mind exposing and forwarding the signal, but at that point you have a (potentially) cross-process signal bridge. It seems that would require some new language to define properly. I definitely think we should expose a fetch being terminated in some fashion to the service worker and there are existing open issues on that (probably also filed by you). E.g., I don't think the server worker knows if fetches are getting terminated when a document is unloaded. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1544#issuecomment-701291666
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2020 10:01:14 UTC