- From: L. David Baron <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 17:09:29 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 September 2020 00:09:43 UTC
@cynthia and I talked about this in a breakout. As I've said in other places (e.g., mozilla/standards-positions#346), this is a small feature, a total hack, but I think it's fine. (At some point I'd be interested in seeing a clearer processing model for the interaction of `@page` rules with available paper sizes; I think the [current spec section](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-page-3/#renderingpages) could have more detail.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/515#issuecomment-698649511
Received on Friday, 25 September 2020 00:09:43 UTC