- From: Kevin J. Sung <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:54:46 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/890/review/485456241@github.com>
@kevinsung commented on this pull request.
> -<a>event listeners</a> whose
-<a for="event listener">capture</a> variable is set to true are invoked, in
-<a>tree order</a>. Second, object's own
-<a>event listeners</a> are invoked. And
-finally, and only if <a>event</a>'s
-{{Event/bubbles}} attribute value is true,
-object's <a>ancestor</a>
-<a>event listeners</a> are invoked again,
-but now in reverse <a>tree order</a>.
-
-Let's look at an example of how <a>events</a> work in a <a>tree</a>:
-
-<pre class='lang-markup'>
+<p>When an <a>event</a> is <a>dispatched</a> to an object that <a>participates</a> in a <a>tree</a>
+(e.g., an <a for=/>element</a>), it can reach <a>event listeners</a> on that object's
+<a>ancestors</a> too. Effectively, all the object's <a>inclusive ancestor</a> <a>event listeners</a>
The use of the word "Effectively" leaves ambiguity as to what the true behavior is. If there is in fact no ambiguity, then I would not use that word; I would replace it with "Firstly" or "In particular" or something like that. If there is in fact ambiguity (I do not know) then it's fine to leave it, though a note of clarification may be helpful.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/890#pullrequestreview-485456241
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2020 22:54:59 UTC