Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Service Worker Scope Pattern Matching explainer (#417)

I've been working on this effort some more recently and have an updated proposal.

The revamped explainer is in the same place:

https://github.com/wanderview/service-worker-scope-pattern-matching/blob/master/explainer.md

I've tried to keep the explainer focused on use cases.  If you are interested in more detail, however, I also have a chromium design document here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17L6b3zlTHtyxQvOAvbK55gQOi5rrJLERwjt_sKXpzqc/edit?usp=sharing

My current plan for moving forward is to:

1. Update the service worker WG in a video call to reaffirm consensus (organizing in https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1535)
2. Prototype in chromium.
3. Write specs based on detail learned from prototyping.

Any additional feedback from the TAG on this updated proposal would be most welcome.

One particular question I am trying to figure out is where to spec the URLPattern.  I'll probably split that off into a WICG repo unless service worker WG wants to take it.

Should I file a new issue or would you like to continue here?  (I don't have permissions to re-open the issue myself.)

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/417#issuecomment-689833712