Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: revamp the way we deal with code points and bytes (#247)

@annevk commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1915,7 +1916,7 @@ constructor steps are:
  <p class=note>{{DOMString}}, as well as an <a for=/>I/O queue</a> of code units rather than scalar
  values, are used here so that a surrogate pair that is split between chunks can be reassembled into
  the appropriate scalar value. The behavior is otherwise identical to {{USVString}}. In particular,
- lone surrogates will be replaced with U+FFFD.
+ lone surrogates will be replaced with U+FFFD (�).

We made up our own convention in https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/#code-points since we found the one in Charmod a bit too verbose, iirc.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/247#discussion_r516475065