- From: hober <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 16:03:28 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2020 23:03:41 UTC
> > The spec needs to list which content types this type of fragment applies to, e.g. does this only work for html? what about plain/text documents? SVG? etc... > > It's implied to be HTML documents only by section [2.3.4 allowTextFragmentDirectiveFlag](https://wicg.github.io/ScrollToTextFragment/#allow-text-fragment-directive-flag) since it makes the change in the HTML document loading steps. I agree it'd be useful to make this more explicit. Would a non-normative note be sufficient because of the above or does this need to be normative? I think you'll need to make at least some normative statements, yes, though perhaps most of this point could be captured in a non-normative note. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/392#issuecomment-634989016
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2020 23:03:41 UTC