Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Scheme-bound Cookies (#483)

TAG is happy with the shape of this proposal. We're still concerned about the proposed introduction of the `Sec-Nonsecure-Cookie` header as it's not obvious that it's the right way to solve the issue of web sites that can't be upgraded (see @ylafon's previous comment). However we are happy to close this for now.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/483#issuecomment-634767557

Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:06:57 UTC