Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] MathML Core (#438)

We had a skim of the spec today in our virtual face to face.

The spec looks extremely thorough and well thought out!

Only a few things stood out to me (I didn't go into depth on each of the elements, or the box model):

- There are a number of open issues in the [DOM and JavaScript](https://mathml-refresh.github.io/mathml-core/#dom-and-javascript) section, which look interesting but seem to be mostly deferred. Are there any of those we should take a look at?
- The list of elements differs slightly from the list in the Explainer - `<maction>`, `<mprescripts>` and `<none>` aren't mentioned in the Explainer, and `<menclose>` doesn't seem to be in the spec.

That said, there doesn't seem to be any reason to keep this review going, unless there are specific things in the spec or associated issues you'd like us to take a look at, so we're going to propose closing - please let us know if you want more feedback from us!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/438#issuecomment-633922433