Re: [whatwg/url] Proposal of .toString({ concise: true }) for nicer output with empty values (#469) from Anne van Kesteren on 2020-05-12 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2020)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 02:03:39 -0700
To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/url/issues/469/627212141@github.com>

Well, `URLSearchParams` uses `x-www-form-urlencoded` underneath. They're not really separate. I was initially somewhat supportive, but now I'm more concerned as I would not want folks to write different parsers to be able to distinguish omitted from the empty string. That's just not a part of this format. I'd recommend omitting the name entirely to represent the null state.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/469#issuecomment-627212141

Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2020 09:03:52 UTC