- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 20:26:43 -0700
- To: w3c/editing <editing@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/editing/pull/206/review/409673018@github.com>
@marcoscaceres commented on this pull request.
> @@ -710,17 +672,12 @@ <h2 id="methods-to-query-and-execute-commands">
would not be <a href="#enabled">enabled</a>.
</p>
</li>
- <li>[=Dispatch=] an [=event=] at <var title="">affected editing
- host</var> that uses the <a>EditingBeforeInputEvent</a> interface.
- The event's {{Event/type}} attribute must be initialized to
- "beforeinput"; its {{Event/isTrusted}}, {{Event/bubbles}}, and
- {{Event/cancelable}} attributes must be initialized to true; its
- <code title="dom-EditingBeforeInputEvent-command"><a href=
- "#dom-editingbeforeinputevent-command">command</a></code> attribute
- must be initialized to <var title="">command</var>; and its
- <code title="dom-EditingBeforeInputEvent-value"><a href=
- "#dom-editingbeforeinputevent-value">value</a></code> attribute
- must be initialized to <var title="">value</var>.
+ <li>[=Dispatch=] an [=event=] at <var>affected editing host</var>
Nit: I wonder if we should use the "fire an event" algo here instead? Also, does all this happen sync or at these queued tasks (and if so, what task source)?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/pull/206#pullrequestreview-409673018
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2020 03:26:56 UTC