- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 20:26:43 -0700
- To: w3c/editing <editing@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/editing/pull/206/review/409673018@github.com>
@marcoscaceres commented on this pull request. > @@ -710,17 +672,12 @@ <h2 id="methods-to-query-and-execute-commands"> would not be <a href="#enabled">enabled</a>. </p> </li> - <li>[=Dispatch=] an [=event=] at <var title="">affected editing - host</var> that uses the <a>EditingBeforeInputEvent</a> interface. - The event's {{Event/type}} attribute must be initialized to - "beforeinput"; its {{Event/isTrusted}}, {{Event/bubbles}}, and - {{Event/cancelable}} attributes must be initialized to true; its - <code title="dom-EditingBeforeInputEvent-command"><a href= - "#dom-editingbeforeinputevent-command">command</a></code> attribute - must be initialized to <var title="">command</var>; and its - <code title="dom-EditingBeforeInputEvent-value"><a href= - "#dom-editingbeforeinputevent-value">value</a></code> attribute - must be initialized to <var title="">value</var>. + <li>[=Dispatch=] an [=event=] at <var>affected editing host</var> Nit: I wonder if we should use the "fire an event" algo here instead? Also, does all this happen sync or at these queued tasks (and if so, what task source)? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing/pull/206#pullrequestreview-409673018
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2020 03:26:56 UTC