Re: [heycam/webidl] Pattern for defining constructors, methods, getters, and setters (#730)

I'm wondering if instead of "The `text` attribute getter steps are: ..." we might want just "The `text` getter steps are: ..." (and same for setter). This could be more future-proof if we ever do a mass update to remove the confusing "attribute" terminology. But, I think such a mass-update is kind of unlikely...

I would put these in the definitions of the relevant constructs. So e.g. https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-attributes (near the definition of "get the underlying value") and https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-operations and https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-constructors (integrating with the current "The prose definition of")

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/730#issuecomment-626752351