Re: [heycam/webidl] Potential naming confusion between WebIDL record types and the (proposed) JavaScript record type (#881) from Anne van Kesteren on 2020-05-08 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2020)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 10:59:03 -0700
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/881/625941012@github.com>

Are they even that incompatible? Should you not be able to pass a JavaScript record to https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#headers for instance?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/881#issuecomment-625941012

Received on Friday, 8 May 2020 17:59:15 UTC