- From: Jarryd <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 12:09:21 -0700
- To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2020 19:09:34 UTC
@annevk I'm not seeing how #86 makes this significantly easier to define. I think we are partially aligned: I've always imagined usageDetails to show a breakdown of usage per-bucket. However, I am confused why the addition of buckets would mean this "would all fall out automatically", as I think the only change would be to the scope of usageDetails. Could you help me understand? localStorage was excluded because it is currently not quota-managed. My thoughts on this are that all storage should be quota-managed, or that at the least, quota should be aware of all storage, and thus it should be displayed in `usageDetails`. However, I'm not too familiar with the story around localStorage. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/69#issuecomment-624835086
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2020 19:09:34 UTC