Re: [whatwg/streams] Rewrite to use Web IDL, and generally modernize (#1035)

>  I'm unsure whether to block landing this PR on async iterator support, or whether we should investigate other approaches, e.g. hard-coding the CI to skip async iterator checks or introducing -expected.txt support to wptrunner (domenic/wpt-runner#9).

Obviously it's preferable if all the tests pass before we land it. If browsers start implementing async iterators based on this new spec, then they're really going to rely on the tests being correct.

However, if it's going to take more than a couple of weeks or so, then a workaround would be better. Having `-expected.txt` support is attractive to me as it lets us write tests for evil things that the reference implementation couldn't reasonably be expected to pass.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/1035#issuecomment-622316365