- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:34:47 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2020 21:34:59 UTC
> It sounds like if we do this, we should do it for all DOM APIs, as it looks like you suggested in #449. This seems like it would be a big change, right? What can we do to make this happen? Do people have strong opinions against it? I think it's probably not that big. In #449 and previous issues we were aiming for alignment, i.e. making the parser and the DOM APIs match. It took us a good amount of work (use counters, etc.) to discover that was likely not web-compatible. (Also, looking at the bug, it seems the process also involved educating me about namespace-related things... fun times.) But with that foundational work out of the way, I think this becomes simpler. I.e., now we know it's just a matter of updating the spec, writing some tests, and filing/fixing some browser bugs. The change is just one line in the spec, to accept more things than were accepted before. And there shouldn't be any compat worries. I think most people are for such a change, although it's been low priority for browser vendors. (Until now? 😄) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/849#issuecomment-600312354
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2020 21:34:59 UTC