Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Spring Virtual F2F (#855)

Since some people reacted positively to my agenda idea, maybe we can run with that?

If that sounds okay, then the next step would be to have the proposed advocates mentioned for specific discussions add a sentence or two to the draft [live agenda](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lpy6k_ZlI5iVo-Y0vJaDfFAQvYRjpZqUcSlnOex2A0Q/edit) summing up where the proposal/issue stands, and how they'd like to focus the discussion during the meeting.

I took a shot at identifying the following people as advocates for proposals/issues: @tabatkins @hayatoito @justinfagnani @rakina @domenic @mfreed7 @diervo @alice. (I put myself down for one topic as well.)

It might turn out that some topics are no longer interesting and can be dropped, or won't have enough new information gathered in time to ensure a productive discussion. In that case, feel free to pull something off the agenda.

Alternatively, if you're not going to be able to attend, or you think an issue with your name next to it would be better handled by a different person, you can remove your name and (hopefully) nominate someone else to act as the advocate for it.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/855#issuecomment-599741599