Re: [whatwg/dom] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#767)

The logo ordering was simply due to the way I appended the W3C logo in from the Python script I wrote. I think that’s just how it ended up when I did the first pass, and it seemed to look fine — and it had the effect of not moving the DOM logo but instead just leaving in the same position relative to the margins — so I just kept it like that in the https://domspec.herokuapp.com/ output that I gave to the W3C as the basis for the CR transition request, and there were no request from the W3C side about moving it. So it ended up just staying there.

But anyway in hindsight I should’ve somewhere noted that as a difference from the MoU sample.

Going forward, for the HTML CR draft, I can ensure that the logos follow the order in the MoU sample. Or else if we actually prefer the logos in the same order was what we ended up with for DOM, we can make them follow that order for HTML, too.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/767#issuecomment-597132303