Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Combining cursors / query execution engine (#298)

apologies beforehand for making a political-statement (also i'm a minor sql.js contributor, but my view are my own):

indexeddb is a subpar substitute for [wasm] sqlite3.
i think its time we finally admit that doing joins in userland-javascript is a flawed concept.  its going to take indexeddb years to reinvent the join-capabilities already in sqlite3, and there's no assurance the reinvention is going to be more usable or performant.

indexeddb could probably make a bigger impact for product-developers, by instead focusing on making blobs incrementally persistable (so sqlite3 blobs can be incrementally persisted).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/298#issuecomment-596753776