Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943)

This looks really good to me, very nice work! We'll have to do some additional abstraction as we deploy this key across more features, but it's almost self-evident how that would be done.

The main thing I'm worried about here is the concern @domenic had as well, that it's not entirely clear where we will end up. https://github.com/shivanigithub/http-cache-partitioning/issues/2 and https://github.com/privacycg/proposals/issues/4 go into this.

I wonder if the initial take could be a bit more hand-wavy about the second key (the top-level one seems like a given at this point) and point to an outstanding issue that captures the debate.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/943#issuecomment-595297650