Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Trusted Types (#198)

So I think given that @alice and @torgo were suggesting we consider closing it, and I think we think we're OK with closing this as well.  I'm not sure that we've gone through everything in detail, but I also think we're reasonably comfortable with this approach at a high level even if we haven't dug into all of the details.

I'd note that I found the explainer a bit confusing, particularly for understanding how the CSP integration works (see previous comment).  But this seems like it's probably straightforward to fix, and it's certainly understandable that an explainer for something that's changed so much over time might get a little confused at points.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/198#issuecomment-594986352