- From: Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:45:23 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2020 21:45:35 UTC
Hi @cmlight - First of all, thanks for the visibility on some of the issues you are tackling. It seems like there is active work happening on a new spec. I think what needs to happen is that when a new spec is ready for review, someone files a new design review issue here with us. Regarding how to write a good spec, we can provide feedback but we are not really equipped to help write the spec itself and some of the answer to that question is venue specific. One approach might be to bring this work to a venue where you might have greater opportunity to bring in expertise in spec development and expertise in related web technologies. For example, a [w3c community group](https://www.w3.org/community/) could be a good low-friction venue. In general, successful web specifications tend to be developed in an open environment and according to a transparent process. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/201#issuecomment-594868183
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2020 21:45:35 UTC