Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Design questions around pay-for-what-you-use (#421)

@alice and I are looking at this in a breakout at the TAG's Wellington face-to-face meeting.

Domenic's conclusion in https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/421#issuecomment-561705979 seems like a reasonable one to me, although I'd note that abandoning built-in modules doesn't mean abandoning work towards the idea that more parts of the web platform should be pay-for-what-you-use.  There still seems to be open discussion in whatwg/html#4696 and elsewhere.

That said, I'm not sure what the goal of keeping this issue open is.  The design questions for which we opened it seem like they are likely no longer relevant.

Feel free to open another issue if you'd like further TAG feedback or discussion on issues related to this topic.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/421#issuecomment-594217792