Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Trusted Types (#198)

> Firstly: is the explainer up to date now?

Yes. 

There's some minor details we're working on w.r.t. the shape of the API. The most relevant ones would be:
 * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/259, 
 * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/258, 
 * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/260, 
 * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/235, 
 * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-trusted-types/issues/248

We're also discussing the exact integration with other specs, e.g.:
 * https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/841, 
 * https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/809, 

That said, the explainer correctly describes the problem we want to address and the solution we propose. Further details are in the [spec draft](https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-trusted-types/dist/spec/). 


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/198#issuecomment-593646969