Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS intrinsic-size (#437)

The explainer for contain-intrinsic-size is now [here](https://github.com/WICG/display-locking/blob/master/explainer-contain-intrinsic-size.md) and the spec draft is [here](https://wicg.github.io/display-locking/contain-intrinsic-size.html). Please note that we're still working on some motivating examples to go along with the explainer.

The motivation for the change stemmed from the responses to this thread. They made us take a closer look at the value that we were providing, and realize that we inadvertently moved away from size-containment and thus moved away from much of the usefuless of the feature. Some more context is [here](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4531). The change to move back to size-containment restored the use for our original use case: to act as a placeholder size when child sizing information may not be available (due to, for example, [subtree-visibility](https://wicg.github.io/display-locking/)). 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/437#issuecomment-593638879