[w3ctag/design-reviews] WebAssembly js-types API (#532)

Saluton TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of the WebAssembly js-types API.

WebAssembly is typed, and its types carry information that can be useful and important to clients interacting with WebAssembly modules and objects through the JS API. For example, types describe the form of imports and exports, including the size limits of memories and tables or the mutability of globals. This proposal adds respective functionality to the WebAssembly JS API in a systematic manner.

  - Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-types/blob/master/proposals/js-types/Overview.md

  - Security and Privacy self-review²: N/A
  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-types/

  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - @Ms2ger, Igalia, editor
      - Till Schneidereit (@tschneidereit), Mozilla, official champion
      - Clemens Backes (@backes), Google, champion
  - Organization/project driving the design: WebAssembly CG
  - External status/issue trackers for this feature (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): [issue tracker](https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-types/issues/)

Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): WebAssembly CG
  - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known): WebAssembly WG
  - Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design: not aware of any
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: [Design of `WebAssembly.Function`](https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-types/issues/16).
  - This work is being funded by: Igalia

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

  🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for **each point of feedback**

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/532