Re: [whatwg/streams] Editorial: move from internal slots to associated concepts? (#1048) from Domenic Denicola on 2020-06-25 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from June 2020)

From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:30:49 -0700
To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/streams/issues/1048/649747070@github.com>

I generally preferred the associated-concept style, but I'm not sure it's worth the substantial effort it would take to move. The better cross-linking would be nice indeed, although we could also accomplish that with internal slots.

> We could also get rid of this note about our "foreign JavaScript specification conventions". 🙂

The use of completion values, with ?/!, would remain.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1048#issuecomment-649747070

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2020 18:31:01 UTC